Pardon me while I flog this dead horse.
Motoko Rich at the New York Times has been all over the story of Margaret Seltzer and her fake memoir of growing up in the Los Angeles 'hood. She even ran through the recent list of frauds, which is growing steadily.
Ms. Rich contacted Riverhead Books, Ms. Seltzer's publisher, and obtained these commitments to the truth from the publisher, Geoffrey Kloske:
“In hindsight we can second-guess all day things we could have looked for or found,” Mr. Kloske said. “The fact is that the author went to extraordinary lengths: she provided people who acted as her foster siblings. There was a professor who vouched for her work, and a writer who had written about her that seemed to corroborate her story.” He added that Ms. Seltzer had signed a contract in which she had legally promised to tell the truth. “The one thing we wish,” Mr. Kloske said, “is that the author had told us the truth.”
Really Mr. Kloske? Is that all you wish? Perhaps I can refresh your memory.
The Times noted that "despite editing the book in the aftermath of the scandal surrounding James Frey, author of a best-selling memoir, 'A Million Little Pieces,' who admitted making up or exaggerating details in his account of drug addiction and recovery, [Seltzer's editor, Sarah] McGrath said she did not independently check parts of Ms. Seltzer’s story or perform any kind of background check. She said she relied on Ms. Seltzer to tell the truth."
What the Times and virtually every other media outlet has missed is that Riverhead is the publisher of James Frey's "My Friend Leonard," the follow up to "A Million Little Pieces." As I have pointed out before, "My Friend Leonard" has even more problems than the first book. Does Leonard even exist? I mean, he's supposed to be a mobster with a heart of gold who adopted Frey in rehab and conveniently disappeared when people started checking Frey's stories. Leonard also allegedly palled around with a judge in rehab. That's very believable. Key sections of "My Friend Leonard" take place in a jail where Frey never served time, and that we know for sure. We also know that his supposed girlfriend, Lilly, probably didn't commit suicide. And from that we can conclude that Leonard never loaned Frey money to bury her.
So let's say you're Margaret Seltzer and you write this gang novel told in the first person and you figure out it will be more attractive to publishers as a memoir. Your publisher, Riverhead, continues to sell "My Friend Leonard" as a memoir, even though Mr. Frey is an admitted liar (not just in his books - he told phony stories repeatedly to the press and to audiences at readings). So wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that Riverhead doesn't really care if your book is true, as long as it sells copies?
One wonders if James Frey's contract requires him to tell the truth?
I am sure the legal eagles at Riverhead added the cute tagline on the cover of the paperback of "My Friend Leonard" to protect themselves against just such accusations. It reads, "An imaginative story of a real life." Pardon my French, but WTF does that mean? That James Frey is a real person, but everything else is made up? Philip Roth writes imaginative stories about characters named Philip Roth, but he calls them novels.
It is staggering that Riverhead can proclaim its commitment to the truth when it comes to Margaret Seltzer while continuing to market "My Friend Leonard" as a memoir, which, by definition, is supposed to be a true story. The small print inside "My Friend Leonard," which reads, "Some sequences and details of events have been changed," gives no hint that entire scenes, characters, and events in the book are entirely made up. How much of a memoir has to be true for Riverhead to publish it? 20 percent? 50 percent? 75 percent?
In the next post, I'll compare Margaret Seltzer to James Frey, and she how she does on the truthiness scale.
If Riverhead's new standard is that memoirs have to be true, they should immediately do to "My Friend Leonard" what they did to Margaret Seltzer's "Love and Consequences" - pull the book from the shelves and issue an apology. Either that or they should call it a novel and shelve it with fiction, where it has always belonged.
Recent Comments